| bonus material: | |
|---|---|
|
|
Find more info on Dakota Fanning at IMDB.com |
|
|
Buy movies with Dakota Fanning at the CNdb Shop |
Dakota Fanning
aka:
Birthday:
From:
Dakota Fanning's Sexy Filmography
Movies this celebrity has appeared sexy or nude in...
| Year: | Movie Title: | |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Hounddog | reviews |
Dakota Fanning New Threads In Pic & Video Forum
- Rare photo-shoots of celebs
- Montana Fishburne (Lawrence's daughter) sex tape caps (1 images in post)
- Dakota Fanning (16yrs old!) so i decided to remove the post
- Kristen Stewart | The Runaways (2010) | panties & more (5 images in post)
Dakota Fanning Biography
Nudity Reviews
Dakota Fanning's reviews by CNdb contributors...
add new review... Hounddog
Rufus83 wrote this review on August 26th, 2011
Nudity Rating:
Scene Description:
Bath tub scene
Review Details:
IN the scene where Lewellen is in the bath when her arm is lifted her nipple is exposed.
ghostwords wrote this review on January 25th, 2007
Nudity Rating:
Scene Description:
NO NUDITY WHATSOEVER
Review Details:
I'm adding this entry simply in order to prevent the inevitable nudity claim by someone who hasn't seen the movie but has fallen hook, line & sinker for the usual Chinese whispers. Ms Fanning isn't even 13 yet, so what are the real odds this this film includes a graphic sex scene? Yes, it does include a rape, but I'll quote an interview with Ms Fanning, conducted by AP writer Debbie Hummel and datelined 24-01-07: "It's not a rape movie. That's not even the point of the film... It's not really happening. It's a movie, and it's called acting. I'm not going through anything... And for me, when it's done it's done. I don't even think about it anymore." Hummel adds background: "The disturbing scene lasts a few minutes but is not graphic. There is no nudity, the scene is very darkly lit and only Fanning's face and hand are shown." However, adds Hummel, this isn't enough for Ted Baehr, chairman of the Christian Film and Television Commission and publisher of the website movieguide.org, who "claims [the film] "breaks federal child-pornography law. He said the law covers material that 'appears' to show minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct." Hummel then quotes Baehr: "Even if they're not actually performing the explicit act, we are dealing with a legal issue here... Children at 12 do not have the ability to make the types of decisions that we're talking about here. If we're offended by some comedian's racial slur, why aren't we offended by somebody taking advantage of a 12-year-old child?"

